Jump to content


THE NEXT 6 WEEK CHALLENGE STARTS MONDAY, Sept 15th. [Challenge Forum] is now live!

Helpful Links to start the challenge:
[Challenge Instructions]
[Challenge Rules Subforum]
[Challenge FAQ]
[Role Playing] - Creating your character and rolling your stats
[Guild Leaders and mods] - If you have questions or issues these are the people to ask :)

Photo
- - - - -

Fixing BMI: You're doing it wrong.

bmi

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Georges

Georges

    Rebel

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1066 posts

Posted 29 January 2013 - 08:45 AM

So, I just read this : BMI Does the Body Mass Index need Fixing?

 

And my facepalm moment was when I realized that they weren't going to address (at all) the fact that if you look at every person out there who is, for instance, 5'10" and 175 pounds, then some of them will have too much bodyfat and some won't.  No equation that links a specific height/weight set to a set of {underweight, normal, overweight} will ever be a good measure of health.

 

(this post was a much needed vent.)


progress:  This is my weight loss progress. I looked at the one thing bottle-necking my work on all my goals, and realized that being overweight is making me miserable.

0.0%
0.0%

it's a start... When I'm closer to my goal (125 lbs, ~45 pounds loss), I will be able to run faster.  My asthma will be under better control.  I will have more energy to do more things.  I will feel better about my body.
 
Current Challenge
BattleLog

Don't let what you cannot do
interfere with what you can do.

-John Wooden

2013 Running Tally: I lost track in July, at 148.925  ((plus 0.5)) but I finished a Very Slow marathon in October. Then I mostly stopped.
2014 Running Tally: 134.1 miles plus 5k (as of 17 September)

#2 Waldo

Waldo

    Revolutionary

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5783 posts

Posted 29 January 2013 - 09:15 AM

Eh, any fix is an improvement.  Better fitting the weight:height relaitonship is a good start.

 

Though I'm not sure why they always strawman the BF% measure (really, there are no ways other than a dexa scan?), the US Armed Forces has a reasonably accurate formula that uses nothing more than a couple of measurements that is pretty quick and easy to take.  It would add all of like 30 seconds to a BMI measurements to turn it into a BF measurement.


waldo

currently bulking


battle log challenges: 12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 
personal website: strength unbound  
follow me: twitter, myfitnesspal
progress photos: Month to Month since 1-2-2012

don't panic!


#3 Snake McClain

Snake McClain

    Renegade

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2483 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 10:49 AM

According to a bmi i did about 8 months ago i was "overweight" and borderline obese. I laughed really hard at this.



#4 Waldo

Waldo

    Revolutionary

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5783 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 11:01 AM

According to a bmi i did about 8 months ago i was "overweight" and borderline obese. I laughed really hard at this.

 

I bet a significant % of men who have visible abs....are overweight by BMI.

 

I'm right in the middle of the overweight band. 


waldo

currently bulking


battle log challenges: 12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 
personal website: strength unbound  
follow me: twitter, myfitnesspal
progress photos: Month to Month since 1-2-2012

don't panic!


#5 161803398874989

161803398874989

    Renegade

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1713 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:17 PM

Eh, any fix is an improvement.  Better fitting the weight:height relaitonship is a good start.

 

Though I'm not sure why they always strawman the BF% measure (really, there are no ways other than a dexa scan?), the US Armed Forces has a reasonably accurate formula that uses nothing more than a couple of measurements that is pretty quick and easy to take.  It would add all of like 30 seconds to a BMI measurements to turn it into a BF measurement.

The DEXA-scan is the only way to learn absolute body fat levels, and that's what they're getting stuck on.

Also, I have nothing to back this up, but doesn't the measurement method have poor interrater reliability?


Quare? Quod vita mea non tua est.

 

You can call me Phi, Numbers, Sixteen or just plain 161803398874989.


#6 Waldo

Waldo

    Revolutionary

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5783 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:39 PM

 

The DEXA-scan is the only way to learn absolute body fat levels, and that's what they're getting stuck on.
Also, I have nothing to back this up, but doesn't the measurement method have poor interrater reliability?

 
Sure, but the basic measurement menthod doen by the military was actually designed to be done on large populations and to be taken easily.

Similar traits to BMI in that respect.

waldo

currently bulking


battle log challenges: 12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 
personal website: strength unbound  
follow me: twitter, myfitnesspal
progress photos: Month to Month since 1-2-2012

don't panic!


#7 blablues

blablues

    Newbie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 10 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 03:20 PM

BMI is so useless that it seems like even an imperfect body fat percentage measurement would be better. According to BMI, my healthy weight as a 5'9" women is 130-169. But, I measure my bodyfat/muscle using a scale with the electric resistance pulse and according to that my lean mass is 130lb. If were 20% fat, which is fitness level for a woman, I would weigh 163lb - barely in the normal category. If I was an average/acceptable 25%-30%, I would be in the overweight category according to BMI. Even with an imperfect bodyfat score, these numbers are way off.



#8 Gainsdalf the Whey

Gainsdalf the Whey

    Wizardly Warrior Mod

  • Guild Leader
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9419 posts

Posted 31 January 2013 - 04:30 PM

BMI doesn't need fixing, it works just fine.  The problem is everyone is using it wrong.

 

BMI was developed to be used as a tool to use the average height and average weight of a population in order to be able to study social or environmental variables that might have made those people in that population, on average, overweight or underweight.  It is not meant to be used on a individual level. The individual builds of those within that population are averaged out.

 

This is why for a person of average build, BMI used on the individual tends to be a somewhat accurate assessment, but anyone who is of a rather slight build such as those who succeed in marathon running (coming in as underweight) or a large build like those very broad people or people with a bunch of muscle (coming in as obese) it is not accurate at all. For a large portion of the population it is not an accurate assessment of body fat, the further away you are from an average build for your height, the worse it gets.


495 / 305 / 575 ~ Thlim Gothodrum
Aliases: Mass-randir, Swolórin, The Whey Pilgrim
Epic Quest and 2014 Goals Challenges: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 32 34 Current Challenge Current Workout Log
"No citizen has a right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training…what a disgrace it is for a man to grow old without ever seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable. " ~ Socrates
"Friends don't let friends squat high." ~ Chad Wesley Smith
“It's a dangerous business, Brodo, squatting to the floor. You step into the rack, and if you don't keep your form, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to.” ~ Gainsdalf


#9 andygates

andygates

    Renegade

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1946 posts

Posted 31 January 2013 - 05:43 PM

Corey, I love you, I just came here to post exactly that.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: bmi

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users